Well we both know how sometimes blizzard is wrong ;P But I think its another reason to change how we store ability data. The current template tries to fit everything into certain boxes but that just isn't how abilities work, maybe its worth it for some abilities to define "aims like" and "damages like" but we can't just keep adding options forever. I've seen the Dota2 wiki just defines trait1, value1, trait2, value2, etc. Trait holds the display name, value holds the number.
What ideas do you have to improve the abilities on the wiki? I posted on Template_talk:Ability_details#Redesign a few days ago asking some questions along those same lines. We definitely have the tools now to make very smart templates and nice data displays.
Well we both know how sometimes blizzard is wrong ;P But I think its another reason to change how we store ability data. The current template tries to fit everything into certain boxes but that just isn't how abilities work, maybe its worth it for some abilities to define "aims like" and "damages like" but we can't just keep adding options forever. I've seen the Dota2 wiki just defines trait1, value1, trait2, value2, etc. Trait holds the display name, value holds the number.
What ideas do you have to improve the abilities on the wiki? I posted on Template_talk:Ability_details#Redesign a few days ago asking some questions along those same lines. We definitely have the tools now to make very smart templates and nice data displays.